Laparoscopic bowel resection of deep infiltrating endometriosis: comparative outcomes of a public teaching hospital and a referral private hospital

Parra, Rogério SerafimFeitosa, Marley RibeiroValerio, Fernando PassadorCamargo, Hugo Parra deZanardi, José Vitor CabralFeres, OmarRocha, José Joaquim Ribeiro daRosa-e-Silva, Júlio César

Purpose To compare the operative outcomes of laparoscopic surgical treatment for bowel endometriosis in a public teaching hospital versus in a private referral hospital. Methods The indications for surgery, type and time of operation, length of hospital stay, need for a temporary stoma, rate of conversion to open surgery, and postoperative complications were evaluated. Results One hundred eighty-one patients were included (150 patients, 82.9%, in a private hospital). In the private hospital, there were more patients with infertility [56% vs. 29%; P=0.01] as an indication for surgery) and segmental resection was more common in the private hospital (48% vs. 29%, p=0.05). The average operative time (211.9±83.4 minutes vs. 128 ± 55 minutes, p 0.001) as well as the length of hospital stay (3.97±1.7 days vs. 1.56±0.85 days, p 0.001) was higher in the public hospital; the rate of conversion to open surgery was significantly lower in the private hospital (2% vs. 32.3%, p 0.001). Operations performed at the public hospital were associated with higher rates of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo II and II) (38.7% x 11.3%, p=0.021; OR 3.2, CI 95% 1.2-8.0). Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery in private centers was associated with reductions in major complications, surgical times, lengths of stay and rates of conversion to open surgery compared to that in public teaching hospitals.(AU)

1. Public Health
2. Health care
3. General surgery
4. Outcome assessment
5. Laparoscopy
6. Endometriosis